.png)
Corporate governance has become a cornerstone of India’s economic framework, ensuring businesses operate with transparency, accountability, and fairness. With the introduction of the Companies Act, 2013, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) guidelines, India has adopted a globally aligned corporate governance structure to foster responsible business practices. The Companies Act introduced reforms such as mandatory independent directors, audit committees, and more rigorous disclosure norms, ensuring greater accountability from corporate boards.
The importance of corporate governance in India cannot be overstated. In 2022, India ranked 40th in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business rankings, reflecting significant improvements in regulatory quality and investor protections. However, these advances raise a critical debate in policymaking: Should the Indian government adopt a market-friendly approach that nurtures open competition and innovation, or should it focus on being business-friendly, offering incentives like tax breaks and subsidies to established corporations?
The market-friendly approach aims to cultivate a competitive, innovation-driven environment where small businesses and startups can flourish. India’s vibrant startup ecosystem is already the third largest in the world, with over 85,000 startups as of 2023, supported by market-friendly policies such as the Startup India Initiative. However, being solely market-friendly may not provide the immediate economic boost that large-scale businesses offer, such as job creation and investment in infrastructure.
On the other hand, a business-friendly government that supports big corporations through favourable policies could spur short-term economic growth and investment. In 2021, for instance, India saw a surge in foreign direct investment (FDI), reaching a record $84.8 billion, largely due to favourable business policies. But this approach risks creating an uneven playing field, where large companies dominate, potentially stifling competition and deepening income inequality.
Brief Overview of Corporate Governance in India
Corporate governance in India is a vital element in ensuring that companies operate with integrity, accountability, and transparency. It represents the system of rules, practices, and processes by which companies are directed and controlled, focusing on balancing the interests of a diverse set of stakeholders, including shareholders, management, customers, suppliers, financiers, government, and the community. A strong corporate governance framework is key to building investor trust and fostering economic growth.
Regulatory Framework
Corporate governance in India is primarily governed by a series of regulatory bodies and laws designed to uphold the highest standards of business ethics and management accountability.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA): The MCA oversees corporate governance for all companies in India, both public and private, through the Companies Act, 2013, which enforces key governance principles such as the appointment of independent directors, statutory audits, and transparent financial reporting.
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): SEBI regulates corporate governance in listed companies through the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) Regulations, 2015. SEBI’s guidelines ensure that companies adhere to transparent disclosure practices, enabling investors to make informed decisions.
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI): These regulators govern the banking and insurance sectors, respectively. Through the Banking Regulation Act, of 1949 and the IRDAI regulations, financial institutions are held to strict governance standards, including risk management and financial reporting.
Key Components of Corporate Governance in India
Shareholders: Shareholders are the core owners of a company and play a significant role in corporate governance by appointing the board of directors to oversee management activities. They hold voting rights to approve critical decisions and ensure the effective utilisation of their investments.
Board of Directors: The board is responsible for the overall governance of the company, providing strategic direction, overseeing management, and ensuring compliance with regulations. A diverse and independent board is crucial for mitigating risks of mismanagement. In India, boards are mandated to have independent directors to enhance objectivity and ensure that the interests of minority shareholders are protected.
Board Committees: Several specialised committees work under the board’s direction, focusing on key areas such as:
Audit Committee: Ensures financial transparency and accountability.
Nomination and Remuneration Committee: Oversees the selection and compensation of directors and senior executives.
Risk Management Committee: Manages potential risks, ensuring that the company has mechanisms to deal with financial, operational, and compliance risks.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee: Ensures compliance with India's mandatory CSR requirements, focusing on sustainable business practices and societal contributions.
Management: The management team is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the company and is accountable to the board. Effective corporate governance demands that management not only focuses on profitability but also on creating long-term value for all stakeholders, ensuring ethical operations.
Auditors: Statutory auditors, appointed by shareholders, provide an independent evaluation of the company’s financial statements. They play a crucial role in certifying the accuracy of financial reports and ensuring that the company complies with applicable laws and accounting standards. Internal auditors also assess risk management and internal controls, further strengthening governance.
Regulators: Regulatory bodies, including SEBI, the MCA, and the stock exchanges, ensure that companies comply with laws and operate transparently. Their oversight ensures adherence to corporate governance practices, including timely disclosures, accurate financial reporting, and safeguarding investor interests.
Stakeholders: Beyond shareholders, a company’s stakeholders include employees, customers, creditors, regulators, and the community. Corporate governance practices in India emphasise a company's responsibility toward all stakeholders, ensuring ethical conduct, fair treatment, and social responsibility. The CSR mandate, under the Companies Act, 2013, for instance, requires companies meeting certain financial criteria to spend at least 2% of their average net profits on CSR activities.
Challenges in Corporate Governance in India
Despite significant advancements, challenges remain in the Indian corporate governance landscape:
Ownership Concentration: Many Indian companies are family-owned or promoter-driven, leading to potential conflicts of interest between controlling shareholders and minority investors.
Independent Directors: While mandated, the independence of board directors can sometimes be compromised, affecting objectivity.
Enforcement: While regulations are robust, their enforcement is occasionally inconsistent, leading to governance lapses in some firms.
Debate: Should the Government Focus on Being Market-Friendly or Business-Friendly?
The debate on whether the government should focus on being market-friendly or business-friendly is crucial to shaping the economic future of any country, especially one as rapidly growing as India. Each approach has its own merits, but the choice between prioritising competitive markets or directly supporting businesses can have far-reaching implications on economic growth, social equity, and long-term sustainability. Understanding the nuances of both approaches, backed by facts and figures, helps clarify the potential impacts of these policies.
1. Market-Friendly Approach
A market-friendly approach primarily focuses on creating an environment where competition thrives. The government plays a regulatory role, ensuring fair competition, transparency, and minimal barriers to entry for new businesses. Policies under this approach aim to benefit the overall market and economy rather than favour specific businesses or sectors.
Key Features:
Encouraging Open Competition: In a market-friendly economy, the government implements policies that reduce monopolies and create equal opportunities for all businesses, irrespective of their size.
Innovation and Efficiency: A market-driven approach encourages innovation, as businesses must constantly adapt and evolve to remain competitive. For example, India's digital economy has seen significant growth through such policies, particularly in the startup sector.
India’s Startup Ecosystem: As of 2023, India ranks as the third-largest startup ecosystem globally, with over 85,000 registered startups. Initiatives like the Startup India policy, launched in 2016, reduced regulatory barriers, offered tax benefits, and facilitated easier funding access for startups. These market-friendly policies have fostered the growth of unicorns (startups valued at over $1 billion), with India housing more than 100 unicorns by 2022.
Ease of Doing Business: In the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business ranking, India improved dramatically, jumping from 142nd in 2014 to 63rd in 2020. Reforms that streamlined procedures for starting businesses, trading across borders, and enforcing contracts have supported a more market-friendly environment.
Benefits:
Innovation and Entrepreneurial Growth: By focusing on the market, the government creates an ecosystem where small businesses and startups can thrive alongside established players. This competition encourages innovation, often leading to new industries and technologies.
Consumer Welfare: A market-friendly approach leads to competitive pricing, better products, and more choices for consumers, as companies compete for market share.
Limitations:
Growth Inequality: A fully market-driven approach can sometimes lead to unequal outcomes, where smaller businesses struggle to compete with large, well-established corporations that may already dominate the market. It can also widen the income gap, as the benefits of growth may not be distributed evenly.
2. Business-Friendly Approach
A business-friendly approach focuses on supporting businesses directly through policies like tax cuts, subsidies, incentives, and reduced regulatory burdens. The rationale is that when businesses—especially large ones—thrive, they create jobs, invest in infrastructure, and drive economic growth.
Key Features:
Tax Incentives and Subsidies: Governments often provide direct financial support to businesses, such as lower corporate tax rates or sector-specific subsidies, to encourage investment and expansion.
Simplified Regulations: This approach reduces red tape and compliance costs, making it easier for businesses to operate. India, for instance, reduced the corporate tax rate in 2019 to 22% from 30%, one of the lowest among emerging economies, to attract more investment.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): In 2021, India received record foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows of $84.8 billion. This increase was largely due to business-friendly policies, including tax reductions, streamlined procedures for foreign investments, and special incentives for sectors like manufacturing, infrastructure, and technology.
Make in India: The Make in India initiative launched in 2014 has been instrumental in attracting large-scale investments, especially in manufacturing. By offering incentives like land, electricity, and financial assistance, the initiative encouraged multinational companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Foxconn to set up or expand operations in India, creating jobs and boosting exports.
Benefits:
Boosts Economic Growth: By supporting large businesses, governments can encourage faster economic growth through job creation, industrial expansion, and infrastructure development. A growing corporate sector can contribute significantly to GDP growth.
Attracts Foreign Investment: A business-friendly government attracts FDI, which brings in capital, advanced technologies, and new employment opportunities. For instance, special economic zones (SEZs) in India have offered tax holidays and reduced tariffs, encouraging global companies to invest.
Limitations:
Market Concentration: A focus on being business-friendly, particularly toward large corporations, can lead to a market concentration where a few dominant players hold significant control. This can stifle competition, hurt small businesses, and create monopolies.
Social Equity Concerns: Business-friendly policies may benefit large corporations more than small businesses or consumers, leading to wealth concentration. There’s a risk that economic growth will not translate into broad-based prosperity, as wealth may become concentrated in the hands of a few corporations.
3. Balancing Both Approaches
Finding the right balance between a market-friendly and business-friendly approach is crucial for long-term sustainable growth. The government’s role should be to ensure that large corporations can contribute to economic growth while maintaining a level playing field for smaller businesses and startups. A hybrid approach that blends market competition with targeted support for key sectors or businesses can be the ideal solution.
Benefits:
Inclusive Growth: A balanced approach ensures that both startups and established businesses can thrive, contributing to job creation, innovation, and economic growth.
Social Equity: By balancing competition and business support, the government can ensure that economic benefits are distributed more evenly, reducing income inequality and enhancing social equity.
Historical Policy Transformations in India
India’s economic history since independence has been marked by two significant episodes of policy transformation: the era of Planned Development beginning in 1951 and the Liberalization reforms of 1991. Both these periods reshaped India’s economy and reflected shifting roles for the government in directing economic growth. Understanding these pivotal moments helps contextualize the ongoing debate about whether the government should adopt a market-friendly or business-friendly approach.
First Transformation: Planned Development
In the early years following independence, India’s economy was largely agrarian, underdeveloped, and burdened by colonial exploitation. At the time of independence in 1947, India faced massive challenges, including widespread poverty, illiteracy, and a weak industrial base. To tackle these issues, the government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, adopted a policy of planned development based on socialist ideals, with the state playing a central role in economic planning and resource allocation.
The First Five-Year Plan (1951-1956)
The First Five-Year Plan, launched in 1951, was modelled after the Soviet Union’s centralised planning system. It aimed to build a self-sufficient economy by focusing on heavy industry, large-scale infrastructure development, and public sector enterprises. The plan prioritised agriculture, irrigation, and energy production to lay the foundation for economic growth. The government sought to direct resources towards critical sectors such as dams, roads, and power plants.
Role of the Government
During this period, the government was seen as the primary driver of economic development. The public sector was given a central role, with heavy industries such as steel, coal, power, and machinery placed under state ownership. The private sector, though allowed, was tightly regulated, and industries were expected to follow government directives.
State Ownership: The public sector was entrusted with leading industrial growth, with sectors like steel, coal, electricity, and transportation being nationalized.
Import Substitution: The government adopted an inward-looking strategy aimed at reducing dependence on imports by promoting domestic industries through import substitution policies. Tariff barriers and trade restrictions were imposed to protect fledgling domestic industries.
Results and Challenges
While the First Five-Year Plan helped boost agricultural output and laid the foundation for industrial growth, it also led to an over-reliance on the state for economic progress. The planned economy model produced mixed results. Though successful in certain sectors like agriculture and large-scale infrastructure, inefficiencies in public sector enterprises and a lack of competition hindered productivity and innovation.
Second Transformation: Liberalization (1991)
The second major transformation in India’s economic policy came in 1991, in response to a severe balance of payments crisis. By the late 1980s, India was grappling with high fiscal deficits, sluggish growth, and a rapidly depleting foreign exchange reserve. The country was on the verge of defaulting on its international debt obligations. Under these circumstances, the government, led by Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao and Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, introduced sweeping reforms that liberalized the economy, marking a sharp departure from the earlier planned development model.
Liberalization Reforms of 1991
The reforms of 1991 aimed to open up India’s economy to global markets, reduce state control, and encourage private sector participation. These reforms were collectively known as the New Economic Policy (NEP) and were grounded in the principles of liberalization, privatization, and globalization (LPG).
Liberalization: The government significantly reduced its control over the economy, removing the License Raj, a system that required businesses to obtain government approval to start or expand operations. This freed businesses from excessive regulation, enabling more entrepreneurship and competition.
Privatization: The role of the public sector was reduced, with many state-owned enterprises being partially or fully privatized. The government began disinvesting in loss-making public sector units (PSUs) to improve efficiency and attract private investment.
Globalization: India’s economy was opened up to international markets. Import tariffs were reduced, export duties were lowered, and foreign direct investment (FDI) was encouraged in several sectors. Global companies were allowed to enter the Indian market, fostering technology transfers, new management practices, and capital flows.
Role of the Government
Post-1991, the government’s role shifted from being a direct participant in the economy to that of a regulator and facilitator. Rather than controlling businesses, the government focused on creating a conducive environment for private sector growth and foreign investments. The goal was to integrate India into the global economy, attract FDI, and boost economic growth through market-driven mechanisms.
Deregulation: Many industries, including telecommunications, banking, and insurance, were deregulated to promote competition. This led to rapid growth in sectors like IT, software, and services, which became global success stories.
Financial Sector Reforms: The government undertook significant reforms in the financial sector, liberalising banking operations and allowing greater private and foreign participation.
The liberalization of the Indian economy had profound effects:
Economic Growth: India’s GDP growth rate surged post-1991. From an average growth rate of around 3.5% during the planned development era (sometimes derisively referred to as the "Hindu rate of growth"), the economy started growing at an average of 6-7% in the 1990s and 2000s. By 2020, India had become the fifth-largest economy in the world.
Foreign Investment: FDI inflows rose substantially from $132 million in 1991 to over $84 billion in 2021. India became an attractive destination for multinational companies due to its large market and reforms that eased investment restrictions.
Job Creation: Liberalization spurred job growth, particularly in sectors like information technology (IT), which emerged as a global hub. The IT sector alone employs over 4 million people today, contributing significantly to India’s export earnings.
Challenges of Liberalization
While liberalization transformed India into a fast-growing global economy, it also brought challenges:
Income Inequality: Economic liberalization has widened the gap between rich and poor. While some sectors, particularly urban areas and industries like IT, prospered, rural and marginalized populations often lagged.
Dependence on Global Markets: With globalization, India became more exposed to global economic fluctuations. For instance, the 2008 global financial crisis impacted India’s growth trajectory, though it was more resilient than many other economies.
Comparing the Two Transformations:
The key difference between these two transformative periods lies in the role envisioned for the government:
In the Planned Development phase, the government played the central role, steering economic development through state control and direct intervention. The public sector was seen as the driver of growth, and economic planning was top-down.
In the Liberalization phase, the government adopted a more hands-off approach, focusing on deregulation, privatization, and creating a competitive market environment where the private sector could take the lead.
The Role of Government in Corporate Governance
The role of the government in corporate governance has evolved significantly over time, particularly as India transitioned from a planned economy to a more liberalized, market-driven economy. Government involvement has shifted from being a direct participant in business operations during the era of centralized planning to acting as a regulator and facilitator in a more liberalized environment. This shift has had profound implications on corporate governance practices and the broader business environment.
Shift from Planned Economy to Liberalization and Its Impact on Corporate Governance
Planned Economy Era (1951-1991)
During the early decades of India's independence, the government adopted a planned economy approach, which greatly influenced corporate governance structures and practices. The government played an active role in the economy by controlling key industries, regulating business operations, and managing public sector enterprises (PSEs). This state-led economic model saw the government as a direct participant in the corporate environment, overseeing and directing the activities of enterprises, particularly in sectors deemed strategic, such as steel, coal, power, and banking.
Key Characteristics:
Public Sector Dominance: A large number of industries were nationalized, and public sector enterprises (PSEs) were established to drive industrial and economic growth. The government maintained ownership and control of key industries, and corporate governance practices were heavily influenced by bureaucratic decision-making rather than shareholder interests or market forces.
Regulatory Control: The government regulates private sector companies through stringent licensing requirements (License Raj), price controls, and import restrictions. This regulatory framework imposed heavy restrictions on private enterprises, limiting their autonomy and decision-making power.
Impact on Corporate Governance:
Limited Accountability to Shareholders: In the planned economy era, the government’s control over major enterprises meant that companies were less accountable to their shareholders, as their primary accountability lay with the government. Public sector undertakings (PSUs), for instance, often faced inefficiencies, and bureaucratic delays, and lacked the competitive pressure that would normally arise in a free market.
Corporate Governance as a Compliance Measure: Corporate governance during this period was largely compliance-driven, with a focus on adhering to government directives rather than aligning with global best practices of transparency, accountability, and shareholder rights.
Post-Liberalization Era (1991 Onwards)
The liberalization of the Indian economy in 1991 marked a significant turning point in the role of the government in corporate governance. The government’s role shifted from direct intervention in business operations to creating a regulatory framework that facilitated private sector growth, foreign investment, and competition. This period saw the emergence of stronger corporate governance frameworks as India integrated into the global economy.
Key Changes Post-Liberalization:
Privatisation and Deregulation: Many public sector enterprises were privatized, and regulatory barriers that restricted private businesses were lifted. This paved the way for private enterprises to operate more autonomously, with a greater focus on profitability, efficiency, and innovation.
Foreign Investment and Globalization: With the opening up of the economy, foreign direct investment (FDI) increased significantly, leading to the adoption of global corporate governance standards. To attract international investors, companies had to improve transparency, disclosure, and accountability practices.
Impact on Corporate Governance:
Strengthening of Regulatory Frameworks: To adapt to a market-driven economy, India saw the emergence of new regulatory bodies and governance codes aimed at improving corporate governance standards. Key institutions like the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) were empowered to enforce regulations that ensure better accountability and transparency in corporate governance.
Focus on Shareholder Rights: In the post-liberalization era, shareholder activism and protection became key priorities. Corporate governance shifted from being compliance-driven to performance-driven, with companies increasingly accountable to their shareholders. This led to greater focus on independent board structures, improved financial disclosures, and transparent decision-making processes.
Government Policies Influencing Corporate Governance
Several key government policies and regulations have significantly shaped corporate governance practices in India, particularly in the post-liberalization era. These policies have aimed to enhance transparency, accountability, and investor protection in the business environment.
1. The Companies Act, 2013
One of the most comprehensive reforms in Indian corporate governance, the Companies Act, of 2013 replaced the Companies Act of 1956. The new Act introduced several key governance measures to align Indian corporate practices with global standards.
Key Provisions:
Board Independence: The Act mandates that certain companies appoint independent directors who are not affiliated with the company, thus ensuring unbiased oversight of management activities.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): India became the first country to mandate CSR under this Act. Companies meeting specific financial thresholds are required to spend at least 2% of their average net profits on social initiatives. This introduced the idea that businesses must not only focus on profits but also contribute to social welfare.
Enhanced Disclosure Requirements: Companies are required to provide greater financial and non-financial disclosures, particularly related to board meetings, management compensation, and risk management.
Impact on Corporate Governance:
These provisions have significantly strengthened the accountability of corporate boards to shareholders, enhanced transparency in financial dealings, and promoted corporate responsibility toward social and environmental issues. The Act has positioned India as a leader in corporate governance among emerging economies.
2. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Regulations
SEBI, established in 1992, plays a critical role in regulating listed companies and ensuring that they adhere to corporate governance best practices. SEBI has introduced several regulations aimed at improving investor protection and market integrity.
Key Regulations:
Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR), 2015: This regulation mandates companies to disclose material information that could affect shareholders, such as financial performance, board decisions, and mergers. LODR ensures that companies maintain transparency and provide timely information to investors.
Takeover Code: SEBI's takeover regulations ensure that minority shareholders' rights are protected during mergers and acquisitions. The code mandates that shareholders receive a fair price during a takeover.
Insider Trading Regulations: SEBI enforces strict rules against insider trading, ensuring that no individual or group with privileged access to sensitive information can exploit it for financial gain.
3. National Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct (NGRBC)
The government introduced the National Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct (NGRBC) to encourage businesses to adopt socially responsible and sustainable practices. The guidelines emphasize the importance of ethical corporate behaviour, respect for human rights, and environmentally sustainable business practices.
Impact on Corporate Governance:
The NGRBC has brought environmental and social considerations into the corporate governance framework, ensuring that companies are not only accountable to their shareholders but also to society at large. This reflects a shift toward stakeholder capitalism, where businesses are expected to balance profit-making with their responsibilities to the broader community.
4. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was introduced to streamline the process of resolving corporate insolvencies and ensure that failing businesses are either restructured or liquidated in a time-bound manner. The IBC strengthened corporate governance by introducing stricter consequences for mismanagement and poor financial practices.
Impact on Corporate Governance:
The IBC has improved the accountability of corporate management by ensuring that poorly governed companies face timely intervention. The code has improved investor confidence by reducing the risks associated with financial distress and non-performing assets in Indian businesses.
Market-Friendly vs. Business-Friendly Approaches
The debate between adopting a market-friendly versus a business-friendly approach is central to the economic policies of any country. Both approaches aim to foster economic growth but do so through different mechanisms and philosophies. The key distinction lies in whether the government prioritizes creating a competitive, open market environment or directly supports businesses through incentives and policies. Each approach has its benefits and drawbacks, and the choice between them can have far-reaching impacts on economic development, corporate behaviour, and social equity.
Understanding the Market-Friendly Approach
A market-friendly approach focuses on creating an open, competitive market where the government ensures transparency, fairness, and minimal barriers to entry. The government’s role in this approach is that of a regulator, setting the rules to ensure that markets function efficiently and fairly without favouritism toward any particular business or sector. The primary objective is to allow market forces—such as supply, demand, and competition—to dictate the growth and success of businesses.
Case Study: India’s Digital Economy and Startups
India’s thriving digital economy and startup ecosystem offer a strong example of the benefits of a market-friendly approach. With the launch of the Startup India initiative in 2016, the government introduced several market-friendly policies aimed at reducing regulatory hurdles, simplifying tax structures, and making it easier for new businesses to access funding.
As a result:
India’s startup ecosystem became the third-largest in the world, with over 85,000 startups registered by 2023.
Several Indian startups achieved unicorn status (companies valued at over $1 billion), particularly in the technology sector. Companies like Flipkart, Ola, and Byju’s thrived in this competitive environment, driven by market demand rather than government subsidies or protectionism.
The Digital India initiative also focused on creating an enabling environment for innovation and competition, particularly in the fintech, e-commerce, and information technology sectors.
While this market-friendly approach fostered rapid innovation and entrepreneurship, it also posed challenges for smaller businesses and those in traditional industries, who struggled to compete with larger, tech-driven enterprises.
Case Study: India’s Manufacturing and the ‘Make in India’ Initiative
The Make in India initiative, launched in 2014, is a classic example of a business-friendly approach aimed at boosting India’s manufacturing sector. The government provided tax breaks, streamlined approval processes, and created SEZs to attract foreign companies to manufacture in India. The goal was to make India a global manufacturing hub, create millions of jobs, and increase India’s manufacturing output.
As a result:
Companies like Apple, Foxconn, and Samsung invested heavily in manufacturing units in India, leading to job creation and technology transfers.
FDI inflows reached a record $84.8 billion in 2021, driven largely by investment in sectors like manufacturing, infrastructure, and telecommunications.
India’s mobile phone manufacturing industry became one of the largest in the world, employing hundreds of thousands of workers and reducing the country’s dependence on imports.
While the Make in India initiative helped attract global companies and boost industrial output, critics argue that it has largely benefitted large corporations and failed to create significant opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Comparing Market-Friendly and Business-Friendly Approaches
Market-Friendly Approach:
Benefits:
Encourages competition and innovation, driving efficiency and consumer benefits.
Reduces monopolistic practices and opens the market to new entrants, including startups.
Lowers the cost of goods and services for consumers by promoting a competitive environment.
Challenges:
Smaller businesses may struggle to compete with larger, established firms without direct support.
Economic benefits may take time to materialize, as businesses need time to adjust to a competitive market.
The gap between successful businesses and those unable to compete may widen, potentially exacerbating inequality.
Business-Friendly Approach:
Benefits:
Promotes rapid economic growth by supporting large businesses, leading to job creation and infrastructure development.
Attracts foreign direct investment, boosting industrial output and technology transfer.
Can provide short-term economic stimulus through direct financial incentives to businesses.
Challenges:
Risk of market distortion, as large businesses benefit disproportionately from government support, leading to monopolistic practices.
Smaller businesses and startups may face barriers to entry, as established firms dominate key sectors.
Wealth inequality may worsen, as large corporations receive the bulk of the benefits, while smaller enterprises and consumers receive limited support.
Finding the Balance
In practice, the ideal approach for most economies lies somewhere between market-friendly and business-friendly policies. Governments need to ensure that their economies remain competitive and innovative, while also providing targeted support to key industries and businesses to drive growth. A hybrid approach, combining elements of both, can foster economic growth while ensuring that the benefits are shared across different sectors of society.
India’s Hybrid Approach:
India’s economic policy in recent years has aimed to balance both market-friendly and business-friendly approaches. While initiatives like Startup India and Digital India promote competition and entrepreneurship, policies like Make in India and SEZs offer direct support to businesses, particularly in manufacturing and infrastructure.
The government has also focused on improving the Ease of Doing Business by reducing red tape and simplifying regulations, while simultaneously providing financial incentives to key sectors like renewable energy and pharmaceuticals.
Conclusion
India's corporate governance has evolved through significant policy shifts from state-led planned development to post-1991 liberalisation. The ongoing debate between a market-friendly and business-friendly approach continues to shape economic policy. While a market-friendly approach encourages competition and innovation, a business-friendly strategy supports rapid growth through direct incentives to businesses.
The key to sustainable economic growth lies in balancing both approaches, fostering a competitive environment while offering targeted support to key sectors. Strong corporate governance, backed by effective regulations, will ensure transparency and accountability as India continues to grow its economy, benefiting businesses and society alike.
Our Directors’ Institute- World Council of Directors can help you accelerate your board journey by training you on your roles and responsibilities to be carried out efficiently, helping you make a significant contribution to the board and raise corporate governance standards within the organization.
Yorumlar